Who were the Pharisees in the Bible?
BREAKDOWN
The Pharisees were a prominent Jewish religious and political party or school of thought that emerged during the Second Temple period, roughly from the 2nd century BCE to the 1st century CE. Their name, likely derived from the Hebrew *perushim* (פרושים), means 'separated ones,' possibly referring to their separation from ritual impurity, pagan influences, or perhaps from the common people who did not adhere to their strict standards. They are frequently mentioned in the New Testament, often in opposition to Jesus, though not exclusively so. Unlike the Sadducees, who were primarily aristocratic priests connected to the Temple and rejected oral traditions, the Pharisees were mostly lay scholars, scribes, and artisans who emphasized the meticulous observance of both the Written Law (Torah) and an extensive body of Oral Law (Halakha), which they believed was also revealed to Moses at Sinai and passed down through generations. This Oral Law sought to interpret and apply the Torah to daily life, making piety accessible outside the Temple cult. Their core beliefs included the existence of angels and spirits, the resurrection of the dead, divine providence coexisting with human free will, and a future messianic age. They believed in the inspiration and authority of the entire Hebrew Bible, not just the Pentateuch. Their influence grew significantly among the common people due to their dedication to religious purity and their emphasis on personal piety, study, and prayer within synagogues, which became central institutions alongside the Temple. While Jesus often condemned their hypocrisy and legalism, as seen in Matthew 23:23-24 where he states, "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint, anise, and cumin, and have left undone the weightier matters of the law: justice, mercy, and faith. But you ought to have done these, and not to have left the other undone. You blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel!" it is important to note that some Pharisees, like Nicodemus (John 3:1-2), sought out Jesus, and after the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE, Pharisaic Judaism evolved into what is known today as Rabbinic Judaism, becoming the dominant form of Judaism.
KEY TERMS
Second Temple period
The period of Jewish history between the building of the Second Temple in Jerusalem (c. 516 BCE) and its destruction by the Romans in 70 CE.
Oral Law
A body of unwritten traditions, interpretations, and rulings that the Pharisees believed were revealed by God to Moses alongside the Written Law and passed down orally through generations.
Sadducees
Another prominent Jewish sect during the Second Temple period, primarily composed of aristocratic priests, who rejected the Oral Law and believed only in the written Pentateuch.
Rabbinic Judaism
The form of Judaism that emerged after the destruction of the Second Temple, evolving directly from Pharisaic traditions and emphasizing the authority of rabbis, oral law, and synagogue life.
Nicodemus
A Pharisee and a ruler of the Jews who came to Jesus by night, indicating that not all Pharisees were entirely antagonistic towards him.
SCRIPTURE REFERENCES
Matthew 23:23-24
Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint, anise, and cumin, and have left undone the weightier matters of the law: justice, mercy, and faith. But you ought to have done these, and not to have left the other undone. You blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel!
John 3:1-2
Now there was a man of the Pharisees named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews. The same came to him by night, and said to him, “Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher come from God, for no one can do these signs that you do, unless God is with him.”
Luke 11:39-42
The Lord said to him, “Now you Pharisees clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but your inward part is full of extortion and wickedness. You foolish ones, didn’t he who made the outside make the inside also? But give for gifts to the needy those things that are within, and behold, all things are clean to you. But woe to you Pharisees! For you tithe mint and rue and every herb, but you bypass justice and the love of God. You ought to have done these, and not to have left the other undone.
Acts 23:6-8
But when Paul perceived that the one part were Sadducees and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, “Brothers, I am a Pharisee, a son of Pharisees. Concerning the hope and resurrection of the dead I am being judged!” When he had said this, an argument arose between the Pharisees and the Sadducees; and the assembly was divided. For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, nor angel, nor spirit; but the Pharisees acknowledge them all.
ORIGINAL LANGUAGE ANALYSIS
Περισαῖος
Pharisee
DefinitionA member of an ancient Jewish sect, distinguished by strict observance of the traditional and written law.
תּוֹרָה
Torah
DefinitionLaw, instruction, teaching; specifically, the Pentateuch or the entire body of Jewish religious law.
הֲלָכָה
Halakha
DefinitionThe collective body of Jewish religious laws derived from the Written and Oral Torah.
ὑποκριταί
Hypocrites
DefinitionActors, pretenders, those who play a part; used by Jesus to describe those whose outward religious performance did not match their inner spiritual state.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
The historical context of the Pharisees is firmly rooted in the Second Temple period, specifically from the Hasmonean dynasty (c. 167 BCE) through the Roman occupation of Judea (63 BCE onwards) until the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE. Following the Maccabean Revolt against Hellenistic Seleucid rule, the Hasmoneans, who were priestly kings, sometimes merged secular and religious power in ways that alienated various Jewish groups. The Pharisees likely emerged from the *Hasidim* (Pious Ones) who supported the Maccabees but later became critical of Hasmonean secularization and corruption. This period was characterized by intense religious and political fragmentation, with distinct groups like the Sadducees, Essenes, and Zealots vying for influence. The Roman presence, particularly under figures like Herod the Great and subsequent Roman procurators, further intensified national and religious tensions, leading to several revolts. Archeological evidence from sites like Qumran (associated with the Essenes) and discoveries of ritual baths (*mikva'ot*) and stone vessels in Jerusalem and other Judean towns indicate a widespread concern for ritual purity, a central tenet for the Pharisees, demonstrating their influence on daily life beyond the Temple.
THEOLOGICAL INSIGHT
Theologically, the Pharisees represent a pivotal point in the development of Jewish thought, emphasizing that holiness and adherence to God's covenant were not confined to the Temple or the priesthood but were applicable to all Jews in their daily lives. Their dedication to the study of the Law, the synagogue as a place of worship and instruction, and the development of an extensive legal framework laid the foundation for Rabbinic Judaism. However, their insistence on the Oral Law and their stringent interpretations often led to legalism, where the spirit of the Law – love for God and neighbor – could be overshadowed by meticulous external observance. Jesus's primary theological critique was not against the Law itself, but against the Pharisees' application of it, particularly their perceived self-righteousness and neglect of 'the weightier matters of the law: justice, mercy, and faith' (Matthew 23:23). This conflict highlights a fundamental tension between legalistic adherence and internal spiritual transformation, a tension that continues to be explored in Christian theology regarding the relationship between law and grace.
COMMENTARY SYNTHESIS
Rashi (Jewish)
In his commentaries on the Pentateuch, Rashi, a renowned medieval Jewish scholar, often expounds upon the practical application of *mitzvot* (commandments) and the importance of oral tradition in understanding the written text. While not directly commenting on the New Testament portrayal of Pharisees, Rashi's work reflects the foundational principles of Rabbinic Judaism, which is the direct heir of Pharisaic thought, emphasizing the ongoing interpretation and application of the Torah.
Matthew Henry (Christian)
Matthew Henry, in his 'Commentary on the Whole Bible,' frequently highlights the spiritual dangers of hypocrisy exemplified by the Pharisees. He notes that their scrupulous attention to minor ritual details (like tithing herbs) while neglecting justice, mercy, and faith, demonstrates a misplaced priorities and a heart far from God. He sees them as a warning against outward religiosity without inward devotion.
John Calvin (Christian)
Calvin, in his 'Commentaries on the Synoptic Gospels,' views the Pharisees as embodying a profound spiritual pride and a reliance on external works for salvation, which he contrasts sharply with Christ's teaching on grace and inward renewal. He often points to their opposition to Jesus as a demonstration of human resistance to divine truth when entrenched in self-righteousness and tradition over genuine piety.
Maimonides (Rambam) (Jewish)
In his 'Mishneh Torah,' Maimonides codified Jewish law, synthesizing centuries of oral tradition that began with the Pharisees. He meticulously details the laws concerning purity, prayer, festivals, and ethical conduct, reflecting the Pharisaic commitment to an all-encompassing halakhic life. His work implicitly champions the Pharisaic legacy of legal scholarship and the authoritative transmission of Oral Law.
Augustine of Hippo (Christian)
Augustine, in his various writings, particularly on the Sermon on the Mount, contrasts the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees with the 'higher righteousness' taught by Jesus. He emphasizes that true righteousness comes from an inward transformation wrought by God's grace, rather than merely external obedience to the Law, which he saw as insufficient without a regenerated heart.